Committees & Hearings
5/12/2005 10:47:42 PM
6/11/2003 9:29:00 PM
City Clerk Records
City Clerk Records - Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
Town of Truckee <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MEETING <br /> September 24, 1997 <br /> 2:00 P.M. <br />Truckee Donner Public Utility District Front Conference Room <br />11570 Donner Pass Road, Truckee, California <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called to order at 2:05 p.m. <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS. None. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES. <br /> <br />3.1 July 23, 1997 - Regular Meeting <br />3.2 August 13, 1997 - Regular Meeting <br />3.3 August 27, 1997 - Regular Meeting <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Tony Lashbrook approved the minutes of July 23, 1997, August 13, <br />1997, and August 27, 1997. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS. <br /> <br />4.1 <br /> <br />97-074/TPM (Tentative Parcel Map); Douglas and Barbara Mott, owner/applicant; Staff <br />Planner, Gavin Ball. <br /> <br />Mr. Mott and Mr. Bob Coombs were both present. Mr. Ball stated that the issues previously <br />raised by Mr. Mott were cul-de-sac design, septic/sewage requirements, and the no access <br />easement. He stated that the sewage requirement was clarified between Nevada County <br />Environmental Health and the applicant, and that the applicant will work out the details of <br />the cul-de-sac design with the Fire District. He stated that a letter was received from the <br />Wall's regarding the access easement, but no changes were recommended by staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Coombs concurred with the staff report stating that the findings and conditions were not <br />too burdensome, and that the applicant would work out the sewage and cul-de-sac design <br />with Environmental Health and the Fire District. <br /> <br />Mr. Lashbrook mentioned that the easement issue raised by the Wall's was not an issue to <br />be resolved by the Town as a function of this tentative parcel map, and was a private issue <br />to be dealt with by the property owners within the Sugar Pine Estates Subdivision. He added <br />that there is no mechanism to require the Mott's to grant this easement, but that the applicant <br />was responsible for the roads as part of this map request. He pointed out that coming up xvith <br />the financial arrangements between the property owners regarding the roads was beyond the <br />scope of the Town's responsibilities. Mr. Lashbrook asked if perk tests were done and these <br />areas defined on the map, and Mr. Coombs responded yes. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.