1998-03-03 3:00 PM
1998-03-03 3:00 PM
12/17/2004 7:37:23 PM
12/5/2000 11:26:41 PM
City Clerk Records
City Clerk Records - Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
Town of Truckee <br /> TOWN COUNCIL <br />SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br /> March 3, 1998, 3:00 P.M. <br />Truckee Donner Public Utility District Board Room <br />11570 Donner Pass Road, Truckee, CA <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Florian called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br />PRESENT: <br /> <br />Council Members Drake, McCormack, Schneider, Susman, and Mayor <br />Florian <br /> <br />ALSO PRESENT: <br /> <br />Stephen L. Wright, Town Manager; Tony Lashbrook, Community <br />Development Director; Tom Covey; Public Works Director; Jon Lander, <br />Town Engineer; and Vicki Soderquist, Deputy Town Clerk <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENT - None <br /> <br />WORKSHOP <br />4.1 Review of 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Recommendation: Council <br />review the CIP and provide direction as desired. <br /> <br />Mr. Wright stated the CIP was the first for the Town and was not an operating budget, but a planning <br />tool. Projects or activities included were $15,000 or more. After review Council would ultimately <br />adopt the CIP annually, but it was important to note that it was not an implementation tool. If <br />Measure A passed the document would be refined to identify specific road projects (segments). Staff <br />utilized past history and general plan expectations for revenue projections which he felt were <br />conservative. Each department had identified their needs, i.e. staffing and operations. The program <br />utilized assumptions, but tried to identify where increased maintenance costs would result. <br /> <br />Summary of Revenues and Expenditures <br />Councilmember McCormack complimented staff on the preparation of the CIP. He then noted that <br />the figures did not match his prior budget figures. Mr. Wright stated that the figures had been <br />adjusted throughout the year to reflect actions taken by Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Susman questioned the revenue increase between FY 97/98 and FY 98/99. Mr. <br />Wright replied that it was assumed the Holiday Inn Express would be built and the revenues <br />reflected the anticipated TOT. <br /> <br />Councilmember McCormack questioned if the 3 Times Voter Rule was included in the anticipated <br />revenues. Mr. Wright replied that they had been included for two years. He noted that there would <br />also be a census conducted in 2000, but it would take approximately 1 '/2 years before those figures <br />were incorporated by the CA Department of Finance. <br /> <br />Councilmember McCormack questioned ifTSSA monies were included in the revenues. Mr. Lander <br />replied that they were non-general fund revenues and were treated like grant funds, but were shown <br />as expenditures. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.