1998-03-03 6:00 PM
1998-03-03 6:00 PM
12/17/2004 7:37:23 PM
12/5/2000 11:26:41 PM
City Clerk Records
City Clerk Records - Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
Town of Truckee <br />JOINT TOWN COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES <br /> <br /> March 3, 1998, 6:00 P.M. <br />Truckee Donner Public Utility District Board Room <br />11570 Donner Pass Road, Truckee, CA <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Florian called the meeting to order at 6:08 p.m. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br />PRESENT: <br /> <br />Councilmembers Drake, McCormack, Schneider, Susman, and Mayor <br />Florian <br /> <br />Commission Members: Estabrook, Grossman, Richards, and Chair Palmer <br /> <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Commissioner Tryggvi <br /> <br />ALSO PRESENT: <br /> <br />Stephen L. Wright, Town Manager; J. Dennis Crabb, Town Attorney; Tony <br />Lashbrook, Community Development Director; Duane Hall, Town Planner; <br />and Vicki Soderquist, Deputy Town Clerk <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />3.1 Ron Hemig, Road Committee Member, urged everyone to vote on Measure A on April <br />14th. <br /> <br />WORKSHOP <br />4.1 Facilitating Community Involvement in the Review Process for Planned Communities <br />and Master Plan Areas. Recommendation: Council review and discuss the report, accept public <br />input and provide staff general direction to prepare policy for future consideration and action. <br /> <br />Mr. Lashbrook gave a brief presentation outlining community involvement strategies for planned <br />communities and master plan areas. The presentation included developing a strategy; goal and <br />objective; how did we get here; existing process; available options; timing of public involvement; <br />methods for community involvement; what to do with public input; and recommendation. Mr. <br />Lashbrook stated that the State law included required elements for specific plans, but master plans <br />were locally defined. <br /> <br />Councilmember Susman questioned the existing process of notification for a Notice of Preparation. <br />Mr. Lashbrook replied that only affected parties were notified, but the process could be broadened <br />to include wider notice, notification in the newspaper, and earlier public input. <br /> <br />Councilmember Susman stated the problem with the existing process was that there was no <br />community buy-in early in the process, the community wanted to be involved. He felt that local <br />"groups" were involved, but they needed to look at residents and members of the community. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schneider referred to the recommendations and felt it should be a Town driven <br />process, but could also involve a committee for community outreach. Mr. Lashbrook replied that <br />it was difficult to get the community to attend the meetings and staff recommended the 2-3 <br />neighborhood workshops be scheduled with 2-3 members of the Council and Commission involved. <br />At that time they could review the process, proposal, criteria, and receive input. After the series of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.